top of page
Writer's picturePaul Francis

Frankenstein: The Monster Born from Science and Imagination

Stitched together from different corpses, powered by electricity, and misunderstood by almost everyone—Frankenstein’s creature has been terrifying (and occasionally tugging at our heartstrings) for over 200 years. But how did Mary Shelley dream up this iconic tale of scientific hubris gone wrong? Let’s dig into the origins of Frankenstein and the monster that has haunted us ever since.


Frankenstein

Beware; for I am fearless, and therefore powerful - The Creature (From the novel Frankenstein (1818) by Mary Shelley)

Frankenstein on Screen: From Silent Horror to Pop Culture Icon

Frankenstein’s creature has had many faces over the years, but none are more iconic than Boris Karloff’s 1931 portrayal in Universal Pictures’ Frankenstein. With his flat head, bolts in his neck, and lumbering walk, this version of the monster became the standard for all future Frankenstein films. The follow-up, Bride of Frankenstein (1935), brought an even more gothic flair, with Elsa Lanchester’s unforgettable shock-haired bride.


Since then, the monster has appeared in everything from The Monster Squad (1987) to humorous takes like Young Frankenstein (1974), proving that this tragic figure can be both terrifying and oddly lovable. The creature’s mix of innocence and strength makes him a timeless character, and the story’s themes of creation, responsibility, and isolation are just as relevant today as they were when Mary Shelley wrote the novel.


The Birth of a Monster: Mary Shelley and the Making of Frankenstein

In 1816, at the age of just 18, Mary Shelley was staying near Lake Geneva with a group of literary heavyweights, including her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley and Lord Byron. During a rainy summer, they challenged each other to write ghost stories. From that challenge came Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, published in 1818.


But where did the idea for this horrifying yet sympathetic creature come from? One potential source was the scientific discussions happening at the time. Shelley was influenced by the emerging theories of her day, especially the work of galvanism, the idea that electricity could reanimate dead tissue. Scientists like Luigi Galvani and his nephew Giovanni Aldini were experimenting with electrical currents on dead animals—and even human corpses. Mary Shelley likely drew on these scientific advances when imagining Victor Frankenstein’s method for bringing his creation to life.


While Shelley never explicitly stated that galvanism was the sole inspiration for the novel, its themes of reanimation and the dangers of playing God fit perfectly with the public's fascination with these early scientific experiments. Frankenstein’s monster, powered by lightning, became the ultimate cautionary tale about humanity’s desire to control life and death.


Frankenstein
"To a new world of gods and monsters!" — Dr. Pretorius (Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

Mary Shelley: Life, Love, and Tragedy

Mary Shelley’s life was as dramatic as the stories she wrote. The daughter of philosopher William Godwin and feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft, she grew up surrounded by radical ideas. Her relationship with the poet Percy Shelley was scandalous—they ran away together while he was still married—and her life was marked by both intense love and deep tragedy.


Shelley experienced the loss of several of her children and her husband’s untimely death by drowning, which undoubtedly influenced the themes of loss and isolation found in Frankenstein.


The World That Made Frankenstein

The early 19th century was a time of great change and upheaval. The Industrial Revolution was beginning to reshape society, sparking new inventions, scientific breakthroughs, and fears about the consequences of unchecked progress. Europe was still recovering from the Napoleonic Wars, and questions about the limits of human power were in the air. Frankenstein taps into these anxieties, with its cautionary tale of a scientist who takes his experiments too far, paying the price for meddling with the forces of life and death.


In addition to scientific concerns, the novel explores the dangers of isolation. Both Frankenstein and his creature suffer from loneliness—Victor through his obsessive pursuit of knowledge, and the creature through his rejection by society. This theme of isolation resonated with many readers then and continues to be a powerful aspect of the story today.


A Modern Prometheus

In ancient mythology, Prometheus defied the gods to bring fire to humanity, only to be punished for his transgression. Victor Frankenstein is often compared to Prometheus, as he too defies the natural order by bringing life to the dead. But like Prometheus, Frankenstein suffers for his overreaching ambition, and his creature becomes a symbol of the unintended consequences of scientific progress.


The Lasting Legacy of Frankenstein

More than two centuries after its publication, Frankenstein remains a powerful cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition and the ethical dilemmas of scientific exploration. But beyond that, it’s a deeply human story about loneliness, acceptance, and the consequences of playing God. So, this Halloween, when you see the iconic green-faced monster staggering through your nightmares, remember—he’s not just a creature; he’s a reflection of our own fears about creation, responsibility, and the limits of science.

TikTok ban: An Act of Market Control, Not Freedom

TikTok ban: An Act of Market Control, Not Freedom

15 January 2025

Connor Banks

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

The Supreme Court of the United States met on Friday the 10th of January to discuss the imminent TikTok ban in the United States, and it's looking like the Supreme Court is going to uphold the ban. This means that TikTok will have to be sold off to an American company or be banned from America.


Facebook and Tiktok fighting each other. Felt design

The United States has long prided itself on being a champion of innovation and free-market competition. Yet, the recent push to ban TikTok exposes a different reality. While the ban is often framed as a measure to protect American "freedoms," closer scrutiny reveals that the motivations behind it are less about safeguarding national security or personal liberty and more about protecting the dominance of American tech giants who have failed to create a competing product.


The National Security Argument: A Convenient Scapegoat

The primary justification for the TikTok ban centres on national security concerns. Critics argue that TikTok’s ownership by a Chinese company poses risks of data misuse or surveillance by the Chinese government. While these concerns warrant investigation, the evidence presented so far has been largely speculative. Moreover, TikTok has taken significant steps to address these concerns, such as pledging to store U.S. user data domestically and offering unprecedented transparency in its operations.


In contrast, American tech companies, including Facebook and Google, have faced numerous scandals over data breaches and misuse, yet these incidents rarely spark discussions of bans. This double standard suggests that the TikTok ban isn’t truly about protecting users’ data but about something far more self-serving: market control.


A Failure to Innovate: American Companies’ Struggle to Compete

Tiktok logo in a 3d blog with a pink background

TikTok’s meteoric rise exposed a glaring weakness in American tech innovation. Despite their immense resources and influence, companies like Meta (formerly Facebook), Google, and Snapchat have failed to develop a platform that resonates with younger audiences in the same way TikTok does. Meta’s Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, both designed to mimic TikTok’s short-form video format, have not captured the same cultural zeitgeist or user engagement.


Rather than innovating, these companies have leaned heavily on their lobbying power to stifle competition. The push to ban TikTok can be seen as an attempt to remove a superior competitor from the market, allowing American platforms to reclaim dominance without addressing their own shortcomings. This approach not only stifles competition but also sets a dangerous precedent for using regulatory measures to quash innovative foreign products rather than improving domestic ones.


The Hypocrisy of “Freedom”

American lawmakers have framed the TikTok ban as a measure to protect citizens' freedoms, yet the ban itself directly contradicts the principles of choice and access that underpin those freedoms. TikTok’s success is driven by millions of Americans who have chosen to use the app, finding value in its unique algorithm, diverse content, and engaging user experience. Restricting access to the platform undermines these users’ autonomy, suggesting that their freedoms are secondary to corporate interests.


Furthermore, the United States’ tech landscape is already dominated by monopolies. Companies like Meta, Google, and Amazon control vast swaths of the internet, often using their market power to squash smaller competitors. The TikTok ban does not address this monopolistic behaviour; instead, it reinforces it by eliminating a rare instance of genuine competition in the social media space.


A Global Perspective: The Irony of “Protection”

The ban also highlights a broader irony. For years, American tech companies have championed global free markets, often entering foreign countries and out-competing local businesses. Yet when faced with competition from a foreign company on their own turf, the response has been to cry foul rather than adapt.


This hypocrisy weakens America’s global standing as a proponent of innovation and fair competition. Instead of banning TikTok, the United States could use this moment to examine why its own companies failed to create a comparable product and what can be done to foster domestic innovation.


The Real Solution: Compete, Don’t Constrain

If the goal is to protect American freedoms and ensure data security, a TikTok ban is a shortsighted solution. Instead, lawmakers should focus on regulating data privacy across all platforms, domestic and foreign, to ensure robust protections for users. Simultaneously, the tech industry should be incentivised to innovate rather than rely on protectionist policies.


TikTok’s popularity is a testament to its ability to connect with users in ways that American platforms have failed to replicate. Banning the app does not solve this problem; it simply papers over it. To truly champion freedom, the United States must allow competition to flourish, even when it means facing uncomfortable truths about its own shortcomings.



The push to ban TikTok is less about protecting American freedoms and more about protecting American monopolies. Framed as a national security issue, the campaign against TikTok is ultimately an admission that American tech giants have failed to keep up with their global counterparts. If the U.S. truly values innovation and freedom, it must resist the urge to eliminate competition through regulation and instead focus on fostering a market where the best product, not the most powerful company, wins.

bottom of page