top of page
Writer's picturePaul Francis

The Curious Origins of Everyday Phrases: From Silver Spoons to Thunder Theft

We Brits do love a good turn of phrase, don’t we? Whether we’re describing a well-heeled neighbour as being “born with a silver spoon in their mouth” or complaining about feeling “under the weather” after one too many at the pub, our language is peppered with sayings we often use without a second thought. But have you ever stopped to wonder where these delightful expressions come from? Let’s take a trip down the linguistic rabbit hole and explore the origins of some of our most popular phrases.


Man steeling thunder
Steeling Thunder

Born with a Silver Spoon in Your Mouth

Historical Origins: This expression hails from an era when owning silver was the hallmark of wealth and privilege. In England, it was customary for wealthy families to gift newborns silver spoons as christening presents. Beyond practicality, these spoons symbolised a prosperous upbringing, cementing their association with affluence.


Evolution of the Phrase: The expression gained traction in the 18th and 19th centuries. It was often used pejoratively to describe those who didn’t work for their fortunes, instead inheriting their wealth.


Modern Use: Today, it’s a shorthand for someone born into wealth or privilege. You might hear it in political speeches, where it’s used to contrast the “self-made” against the “inherited elite.”



Bite the Bullet

Historical Origins: This grisly phrase comes from the battlefield, particularly in the 19th century, when anaesthesia was scarce or unavailable. Soldiers undergoing surgery were given bullets to bite down on to cope with the pain. The metal’s firmness prevented them from accidentally biting their tongues during excruciating procedures.


Evolution of the Phrase: By the early 20th century, it had transitioned from literal pain endurance to a metaphorical act of steeling oneself against an unpleasant task.


Modern Use: Whether it’s tackling a dentist visit or finally dealing with a mountain of emails, “biting the bullet” is all about embracing the inevitable.



The Lion’s Share

Historical Origins: This phrase originates from Aesop’s fables, a collection of ancient Greek tales with moral lessons. In one story, a lion partners with other animals to hunt. When dividing the spoils, the lion claims the entire share, citing his strength and authority.


Evolution of the Phrase: Though initially used to critique greed, by the Victorian era, the phrase began to refer to taking the majority rather than the entirety.


Modern Use: These days, it might describe a company taking the biggest slice of profits or someone hogging the last of the dessert.



The Early Bird Catches the Worm

Historical Origins: First recorded in a 17th-century English proverb collection, this phrase is straightforward in its wisdom: success often comes to those who act promptly. Birds, especially robins, were observed catching worms in the morning, creating this timeless metaphor.


Evolution of the Phrase: By the 19th century, it was commonly used to motivate punctuality and proactiveness in both work and daily life.


Modern Use: A favourite among motivational speakers, this saying often underscores the value of timeliness in seizing opportunities.



The Best of Both Worlds

Historical Origins: Emerging in the late 18th century, the phrase initially described an ideal balance of opposing forces, such as work and leisure. Its first notable literary use appears in the works of Jane Austen, where it expressed harmonious living.


Evolution of the Phrase: With time, it became a way to describe achieving dual benefits from contrasting situations.


Modern Use: From hybrid cars to flexible work arrangements, we use it to extol anything that combines two positive aspects into one delightful package.



The Whole Nine Yards

Historical Origins: Though its exact origin is hotly debated, one compelling theory ties it to WWII. Fighter planes had ammunition belts that were nine yards long. To use “the whole nine yards” meant exhausting every bullet in battle.


Evolution of the Phrase: From military jargon, it entered the civilian language in the mid-20th century to mean giving or using everything available.


Modern Use: Whether throwing an extravagant party or decking the halls at Christmas, this phrase captures a go-big-or-go-home mentality.


Stealing Someone’s Thunder

Historical Origins: This one comes from the theatre! In the 18th century, playwright John Dennis invented a sound effect mimicking thunder for his play. When his production flopped, he discovered another theatre had swiped his idea, prompting him to exclaim they were “stealing his thunder.”


Evolution of the Phrase: It quickly evolved to describe any situation where someone takes undue credit or attention from another.


Modern Use: From hijacked birthday parties to overshadowed presentations, thunder theft is all too common.



Under the Weather

Historical Origins: This nautical phrase referred to sailors feeling ill when exposed to harsh conditions. When under heavy weather, they often retreated below deck, leading to the expression.


Evolution of the Phrase: It soon came ashore, becoming a catch-all term for feeling unwell.


Modern Use: A polite way to excuse yourself from work or a social commitment, it’s often paired with a vague cough for extra effect.



Know the Ropes

Historical Origins: This is firmly anchored in the world of sailing. Knowing the ropes was essential for operating sails effectively on a ship. Mastery of these skills marked the difference between a seasoned sailor and a novice.


Evolution of the Phrase: By the 19th century, it was figuratively applied to any skill set requiring expertise.


Modern Use: From tech wizards to tradespeople, anyone proficient in their field “knows the ropes.”



Whether rooted in seas, surgeries, or scandals, the phrases we use daily are rich in history and humour. Next time you slip one into a conversation, spare a thought for its storied past—or just enjoy the puzzled look on someone’s face as they try to “know the ropes” of what you’re saying.

TikTok ban: An Act of Market Control, Not Freedom

TikTok ban: An Act of Market Control, Not Freedom

15 January 2025

Connor Banks

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

The Supreme Court of the United States met on Friday the 10th of January to discuss the imminent TikTok ban in the United States, and it's looking like the Supreme Court is going to uphold the ban. This means that TikTok will have to be sold off to an American company or be banned from America.


Facebook and Tiktok fighting each other. Felt design

The United States has long prided itself on being a champion of innovation and free-market competition. Yet, the recent push to ban TikTok exposes a different reality. While the ban is often framed as a measure to protect American "freedoms," closer scrutiny reveals that the motivations behind it are less about safeguarding national security or personal liberty and more about protecting the dominance of American tech giants who have failed to create a competing product.


The National Security Argument: A Convenient Scapegoat

The primary justification for the TikTok ban centres on national security concerns. Critics argue that TikTok’s ownership by a Chinese company poses risks of data misuse or surveillance by the Chinese government. While these concerns warrant investigation, the evidence presented so far has been largely speculative. Moreover, TikTok has taken significant steps to address these concerns, such as pledging to store U.S. user data domestically and offering unprecedented transparency in its operations.


In contrast, American tech companies, including Facebook and Google, have faced numerous scandals over data breaches and misuse, yet these incidents rarely spark discussions of bans. This double standard suggests that the TikTok ban isn’t truly about protecting users’ data but about something far more self-serving: market control.


A Failure to Innovate: American Companies’ Struggle to Compete

Tiktok logo in a 3d blog with a pink background

TikTok’s meteoric rise exposed a glaring weakness in American tech innovation. Despite their immense resources and influence, companies like Meta (formerly Facebook), Google, and Snapchat have failed to develop a platform that resonates with younger audiences in the same way TikTok does. Meta’s Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, both designed to mimic TikTok’s short-form video format, have not captured the same cultural zeitgeist or user engagement.


Rather than innovating, these companies have leaned heavily on their lobbying power to stifle competition. The push to ban TikTok can be seen as an attempt to remove a superior competitor from the market, allowing American platforms to reclaim dominance without addressing their own shortcomings. This approach not only stifles competition but also sets a dangerous precedent for using regulatory measures to quash innovative foreign products rather than improving domestic ones.


The Hypocrisy of “Freedom”

American lawmakers have framed the TikTok ban as a measure to protect citizens' freedoms, yet the ban itself directly contradicts the principles of choice and access that underpin those freedoms. TikTok’s success is driven by millions of Americans who have chosen to use the app, finding value in its unique algorithm, diverse content, and engaging user experience. Restricting access to the platform undermines these users’ autonomy, suggesting that their freedoms are secondary to corporate interests.


Furthermore, the United States’ tech landscape is already dominated by monopolies. Companies like Meta, Google, and Amazon control vast swaths of the internet, often using their market power to squash smaller competitors. The TikTok ban does not address this monopolistic behaviour; instead, it reinforces it by eliminating a rare instance of genuine competition in the social media space.


A Global Perspective: The Irony of “Protection”

The ban also highlights a broader irony. For years, American tech companies have championed global free markets, often entering foreign countries and out-competing local businesses. Yet when faced with competition from a foreign company on their own turf, the response has been to cry foul rather than adapt.


This hypocrisy weakens America’s global standing as a proponent of innovation and fair competition. Instead of banning TikTok, the United States could use this moment to examine why its own companies failed to create a comparable product and what can be done to foster domestic innovation.


The Real Solution: Compete, Don’t Constrain

If the goal is to protect American freedoms and ensure data security, a TikTok ban is a shortsighted solution. Instead, lawmakers should focus on regulating data privacy across all platforms, domestic and foreign, to ensure robust protections for users. Simultaneously, the tech industry should be incentivised to innovate rather than rely on protectionist policies.


TikTok’s popularity is a testament to its ability to connect with users in ways that American platforms have failed to replicate. Banning the app does not solve this problem; it simply papers over it. To truly champion freedom, the United States must allow competition to flourish, even when it means facing uncomfortable truths about its own shortcomings.



The push to ban TikTok is less about protecting American freedoms and more about protecting American monopolies. Framed as a national security issue, the campaign against TikTok is ultimately an admission that American tech giants have failed to keep up with their global counterparts. If the U.S. truly values innovation and freedom, it must resist the urge to eliminate competition through regulation and instead focus on fostering a market where the best product, not the most powerful company, wins.

bottom of page