Reeves’ pubs U-turn: how business rates sparked a revolt, and why ministers are now under fire

15 January 2026

Paul Francis

Want your article or story on our site? Contact us here

Rachel Reeves is preparing a U-turn on business rates for pubs after an unusually public backlash from landlords, trade bodies, and even some Labour MPs. In recent days, pubs across the country have reportedly refused service to, or outright barred, Labour MPs in protest, turning a technical tax change into a political flashpoint about competence, consultation, and whether the government understood its own numbers.

Two pints of frothy beer on a wooden ledge, reflecting on a window. Warm, dim lighting creates a cozy atmosphere.

The row centres on business rates, the property-based tax paid on most non-domestic premises. For pubs, it is often one of the highest fixed costs after staffing and energy. And while the government has argued its reforms were meant to make the system fairer for high street businesses, many publicans say the real world impact is the opposite: higher bills arriving at the same time as wage costs and other overheads are already rising.

What changed and why pubs reacted so fiercely

The immediate trigger was the November Budget package, which set out changes tied to the 2026 business rates revaluation and the planned move away from pandemic era relief. As the details landed, hospitality groups warned that many pubs would be hit by sharp rises because their rateable values, the Valuation Office Agency’s estimate of a property’s annual rental value, had increased significantly at revaluation.

A Reuters report published on 8 January 2026 described the government preparing measures to “soften the impact” of the planned hike after industry warnings that closures would follow. It also noted trade body concerns about elevated rateable values and warned that thousands of smaller pubs could face a bill for the first time.

The anger quickly became visible. ITV News reported on pub owners in Dorset who began banning Labour MPs after the Budget, with the campaign spreading as other pubs joined in. LabourList also reported that more than 1,000 pubs had banned Labour MPs from their premises in protest. Sky News similarly reported that pubs had been banning Labour MPs over the rises due to begin in April.

How business rates are actually calculated, with pub-friendly examples

Business rates can sound opaque, but the calculation is straightforward in principle:

Business rates bill = Rateable value x Multiplier, minus any reliefs

Where it became combustible for pubs is that multiple moving parts changed at once: revaluation shifted rateable values, multipliers were adjusted for different sectors, and pandemic era relief was being reduced or removed.

The government’s own Budget factsheet includes worked examples that show why bills can jump even when headline multipliers look lower.

Example 1: a pub whose rateable value rises modestly: In 2025/26, a pub with a £30,000 rateable value used a multiplier of 49.9p and then deducted 40% retail, hospitality and leisure relief. The factsheet sets out the steps: £30,000 x 0.499 = £14,970, then 40% relief reduces that to a final bill of £8,982. After revaluation, the rateable value rises to £39,000. The pub qualifies for a lower small business multiplier of 38.2p, so before reliefs: £39,000 x 0.382 = £14,898. Transitional support caps the increase, resulting in a final bill of £10,329.

Even here, the bill rises. The cap stops it from rising as sharply as it otherwise would, but it still climbs.

Example 2: a pub whose rateable value more than doubles: In the most politically explosive scenario, the factsheet describes a pub whose rateable value rises from £50,000 to £110,000 at revaluation. In 2025/26, the bill is calculated as £50,000 x 0.499 = £24,950, then reduced by 40% relief to £14,970. In 2026/27, before any relief, the bill would be £110,000 x 0.43 = £47,300. Transitional support then caps the increase, producing a final bill of £19,461.

That is still a meaningful jump in a single year, even with protections. For pubs operating on thin margins, that scale of increase can mean the difference between staying open and closing.

This is why so many publicans argue that the political messaging did not match the lived reality. They were told reforms would support the high street, then saw calculations that delivered higher costs.

What Reeves is now doing to correct it

The government has not published the full final package yet, but multiple reports describe a targeted climbdown.

Reuters reported that a support package would be outlined in the coming days and that it would include measures addressing business rates, alongside licensing and deregulation. LabourList reported that Treasury officials were expected to reduce the percentage of a pub’s rateable value used to calculate business rates and introduce a transitional relief fund. The Independent reported ministers briefing that Reeves was expected to extend some form of relief rather than scrap support entirely from April, after pressure from Labour MPs and the sector.

In practical terms, “softening” the rise can be done in a few ways:

Increasing or extending pub-specific relief so bills do not jump as sharply in April 2026
Adjusting the multiplier applied to pubs within the retail, hospitality and leisure category
Strengthening transitional relief so the cap on year to year increases is tighter
Supplementary measures like licensing changes, to reduce other cost pressures

The direction of travel is clear: the Treasury is trying to stop the revaluation shock from landing all at once on pubs.

The critics’ argument: ministers did not do their homework

The most damaging strand of this story is not the U turn itself, but the allegation that ministers did not understand the impact at the point of announcement.

Sky News has reported internal disquiet about the business rates increase, reflecting wider unease about the political cost of the policy. ITV has also reported pub owners arguing that the “devil is in the detail,” a polite way of saying the announcement did not match the numbers that followed.

Most seriously, reporting summarised from The Times states that Business Secretary Peter Kyle acknowledged ministers did not have key details about the revaluation’s effects on hospitality at the time of the November Budget, and that the property specific revaluations created an unexpected burden for some pubs.

That admission fuels the criticism that this was not simply a policy misfire, but a failure of preparation. The core accusation from critics is straightforward: if the government is reshaping a tax system built on property values, then the people in charge should have had a clear grasp of what the valuation changes would do to real businesses. If they did not, they were not doing the job properly.

Even if ministers argue the valuation process is independent, the political reality is that pubs heard one message, then saw another outcome. The result has been a crisis of trust that a late rescue package may soften, but not erase.

What this episode tells us about tax policy and trust

Pubs are not just businesses. They are community anchors and cultural institutions, which is why this backlash travelled so quickly from accountancy jargon to front-page politics.

Reeves’ U turn may yet prevent the worst outcomes for some pubs. But the episode has exposed a deeper vulnerability: when the government announces complex reforms without convincing evidence, it understands the knock on effects, and the backlash is not only economic. It becomes personal, symbolic, and politically contagious.

If the Treasury wants to draw a line under this, it will need to do more than patch the numbers. It will need to convince the public and the businesses affected that decisions are being made with full visibility of the consequences, not discovered after the revolt begins.

Current Most Read

When AI Crosses the Line: Why the Grok Controversy Has Triggered a Regulatory Reckoning

A World on Edge: Why Global Tensions Are Rising and What History Can Tell Us

A Love Letter to Ahoy: The YouTube Channel That Captivates Through Style, Substance, and Storytelling

Paul Francis
Sep 10, 2024
4 min read

As a huge fan of Ahoy, I can confidently say that there’s nothing quite like the unique art and video style that Stuart Brown presents on his channel. From the first time I watched one of his videos, I was captivated by the meticulous attention to detail, the clean and minimalist visuals, and the soothing cadence of his narration. Stuart Brown’s voice is in a league of its own—both informative and comforting, guiding viewers through complex histories and technical analyses with an ease that few can match.

But What Is Ahoy?

Ahoy is a YouTube channel created by Stuart Brown, a master of video essays primarily focused on video games, gaming history, and the technology that powers them. The channel is renowned for its deep research, high production quality, and engaging storytelling. Each video is not just a presentation of facts but a carefully crafted narrative that ties together historical, cultural, and technical insights in a way that feels both educational and entertaining.

Stuart Brown himself is a bit of an enigma—a meticulous researcher, a talented storyteller, and a skilled visual artist. His work on Ahoy reflects his deep passion for gaming and technology, but it’s also clear that he has a broader interest in history and culture. Brown’s ability to connect these fields makes Ahoy’s content appeal not just to gamers but to anyone with an interest in media studies, history, or technology.

The target audience of Ahoy is diverse. While the core viewership undoubtedly consists of gamers and tech enthusiasts, the channel’s reach extends to historians, artists, and educators. Ahoy’s content is accessible to a wide range of viewers because it transcends the typical boundaries of gaming channels—each video is a piece of art, a historical document, and a narrative journey all rolled into one.

Unveiling the Gems: Ahoy’s Must-Watch Videos

With a catalogue of exceptional content, selecting the best Ahoy videos is a challenging task, but there are certain videos that stand out for their depth, creativity, and impact. Here are five of the most remarkable ones:

"The First Video Game" (2014):
- This video dives into the origins of video games, exploring early contenders for the title of "first" video game. From "Tennis for Two" to "Spacewar!," Stuart Brown uncovers the roots of gaming with his signature blend of thorough research and engaging storytelling. It’s a fascinating exploration of how the medium began, and it raises thought-provoking questions about what truly constitutes a video game.

"A Brief History of Graphics" (2016):
- A visual and historical journey, this video tracks the evolution of computer graphics from the earliest pixelated images to the stunning photorealism of today’s games. Brown’s ability to explain complex technical concepts in an accessible way makes this video a must-watch for anyone interested in the intersection of art and technology.

"The Story of Doom" (2017):
- "Doom" is one of the most iconic first-person shooters ever made, and this video tells the story of its creation, impact, and enduring legacy. Brown delves into the cultural phenomenon that "Doom" became, offering insights into why it continues to be a touchstone in gaming history. The video is a perfect blend of technical analysis and cultural commentary.

"Polybius: The Game That Doesn't Exist" (2017):
- One of Ahoy’s most popular and talked-about videos, this documentary explores the urban legend of "Polybius," a mysterious arcade game rumoured to cause psychological effects in players. Brown’s investigation into the myth is masterful, blending history, speculation, and eerie storytelling in a way that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats.

Community Favorite: "Iconic Arms: The AK-47" (2015)

No discussion of Ahoy would be complete without mentioning the "Iconic Arms" series, and the video on the AK-47 is a standout. In this video, Brown explores the history of the AK-47, its cultural significance, and its representation in video games. It’s a fascinating look at how a single piece of military hardware became an icon, both in the real world and in the digital realms of gaming. The video is a community favourite for its in-depth analysis and the way it ties together historical and cultural threads.

The Four-Byte Burger: A Symbol of Digital Ingenuity

One of the more unusual but deeply fascinating topics covered by Ahoy is the "Four-Byte Burger," which Stuart Brown discusses in his video "A Brief History of Graphics." The "Four-Byte Burger" is an early piece of computer art, representing a hamburger created using only 4 bytes of data—just 32 bits.

When this artwork was created, computer memory and processing power were extremely limited. Despite these constraints, early digital artists and programmers managed to create recognizable images like the "Four-Byte Burger." This piece of art is not just a quirky footnote in the history of computer graphics but also a testament to the ingenuity of early digital pioneers. It’s a symbol of how creativity can flourish even within the strictest of limitations and a reminder of the humble beginnings from which modern digital art has evolved.

Why Ahoy Deserves Your Attention

Ahoy is not just a YouTube channel—it’s a masterclass in how to create compelling, informative, and visually stunning content. Stuart Brown’s unique approach to video essays makes each upload a treat for anyone interested in video games, history, or technology. Whether you’re drawn in by the minimalist art style, the meticulously researched content, or Brown’s soothing narration, there’s something in Ahoy’s catalogue for everyone. For those of us who are fans, Ahoy is more than just a source of entertainment—it’s a source of inspiration, education, and a deeper appreciation for the rich tapestry of gaming history.

https://www.youtube.com/@XboxAhoy/featured